|
| Concurrence | width=25px | | Other |- | width=25px | | Dissent | width=25px | | Concurrence/dissent | white-space: nowrap |Total = | 32 |- | colspan=2 | Bench opinions = 29 | colspan=2 | Opinions relating to orders = 2 | colspan=2 | In-chambers opinions = 1 |- | white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top | Unanimous decisions: 0 | colspan=2 valign=top | Most joined by: Ginsburg (16) | colspan=2 valign=top | Least joined by: Rehnquist, Thomas (2) |} |} |} | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens dissented from the Court's ''per curiam'' decision that ruled that a police officer who shot a suspect fleeing in an automobile was entitled to qualified immunity. Stevens argued that the officer's conduct was objectively unreasonable because deadly force should not have been used to prevent the suspect's escape. He also believed that the immunity issue should have been decided by a jury, and that the Court should have held full briefing and argument on the case. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Right to a jury trial: determination of federal sentencing factors by judge | width=20% valign=top |Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of two opinions for the Court, each resolving different parts of the case; the other was filed by Breyer. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Right to a jury trial: determination of federal sentencing factors by judge | width=20% valign=top |Souter; Scalia (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of three dissents from Breyer's opinion for the Court in part. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Souter and Ginsburg filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Death penalty: execution of minors | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Voter intimidation | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens denied a stay. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens concurred in the Court's denial of ''certiorari''. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens was the lone dissenter from Ginsburg's 8-1 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |O'Connor |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of two dissents from Kennedy's 5-4 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg; Souter (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens wrote an opinion respecting the Court's denial of ''certiorari'' to emphasize that the decision not to review the lower court's decision was not a judgment on the merits. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Commerce Clause: prohibition of state-sanctioned intrastate production of medical marijuana | width=20% valign=top |Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |O'Connor and Thomas filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Thomas filed a dissent. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (in part) |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of two dissents from O'Connor's 5-4 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Eminent domain | width=20% valign=top |Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |O'Connor and Thomas filed dissents. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Souter |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens dissented from Scalia's 7-2 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top | | width=20% valign=top |Breyer |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of two dissents from Kennedy's 5-4 decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Establishment Clause | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top |Stevens filed one of three dissents from Rehnquist's plurality decision. |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Due process right to enforce restraining order | width=20% valign=top |Ginsburg |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |- | align=right valign=top | | valign=top |Telecommunications | width=20% valign=top | |- | bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top | |} ==References== * * * 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「2004 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|